And I certainly have one or two things to say about this.
I have to rush now, but I've been up since the wee hours of the morning and somehow the thought of this neglected and forgotten blog suddenly became compelling.
Friday, March 12, 2010
Saturday, March 03, 2007
How Israel lives with Palestine's hunger
This is perhaps the best commentary I've come across by an Israeli writer on Israel's hypocrisy. Its candid, non-apologetic and does not present half-truths. Its the truth whether you like it or not and for that I strongly recommend reading Ran HaCohen's excellent article on how Israeli occupation justifies its own war crimes.
(It's high time we -Arabs- asked ourselves how we live with Palestine's hunger, Iraq's bloodbath and our own death)
How to Live With Hunger
by Ran HaCohen
When I was a child, a popular argument in favor of the Israeli "liberation," i.e., occupation, of the Palestinian territories was its being a blessing for the Palestinians themselves. "When we took it over," I was told at school, "there were just a couple of cars in the entire West Bank. And look how many they have now!" Indeed, in the first decades of the Israeli occupation, the Palestinian standard of living was on the rise – not because of Israeli investments (Israel never invested a cent in Palestinian welfare or infrastructure), but mainly because Israel exploited the Palestinians as a cheap labor force, and even a cheap labor force gets paid.
The welfare argument cannot be heard anymore, now that one in two Gaza and West Bank households is "food insecure" or in danger of becoming so, as a UN report recently revealed. Not that it changed anything for the Israeli expansionists: once that colonialist argument became obsolete, the supporters of the occupation switched to other excuses. That's the nice thing about the politics of the occupation: the support for it is based on excuses, not reasons. Whenever one excuse fails, Israel's propaganda machine offers another.
It's interesting to observe, however, how Israelis nowadays cope with what used to be such a popular excuse. Having claimed the occupation ameliorated Palestinian life, Israelis now have to face hunger and starvation at their doorstep. How do they live with it?
(It's high time we -Arabs- asked ourselves how we live with Palestine's hunger, Iraq's bloodbath and our own death)
How to Live With Hunger
by Ran HaCohen
When I was a child, a popular argument in favor of the Israeli "liberation," i.e., occupation, of the Palestinian territories was its being a blessing for the Palestinians themselves. "When we took it over," I was told at school, "there were just a couple of cars in the entire West Bank. And look how many they have now!" Indeed, in the first decades of the Israeli occupation, the Palestinian standard of living was on the rise – not because of Israeli investments (Israel never invested a cent in Palestinian welfare or infrastructure), but mainly because Israel exploited the Palestinians as a cheap labor force, and even a cheap labor force gets paid.
The welfare argument cannot be heard anymore, now that one in two Gaza and West Bank households is "food insecure" or in danger of becoming so, as a UN report recently revealed. Not that it changed anything for the Israeli expansionists: once that colonialist argument became obsolete, the supporters of the occupation switched to other excuses. That's the nice thing about the politics of the occupation: the support for it is based on excuses, not reasons. Whenever one excuse fails, Israel's propaganda machine offers another.
It's interesting to observe, however, how Israelis nowadays cope with what used to be such a popular excuse. Having claimed the occupation ameliorated Palestinian life, Israelis now have to face hunger and starvation at their doorstep. How do they live with it?
Read full commentary here
Saturday, February 03, 2007
Hats off for GEORGE GALLOWAY
Here George expose the "myopic" British foreign secretary's "rose tinted" glasses and how she refuses to see the crisis that is coming..
Excerpts:
"There is no democracy in Lebanon.. if there was a democracy Hassan Nasrallah would be president but he can't be because the president of Lebanon has to be Christian, the parliament speaker has to be Shia and the prime minister Sunni... It is the opposite of democracy. It is based on a census that is over 50 out of date.."
"For the moment the trial of Tony Blair is taking place on Channel 4 television. But the day will come - and it's coming soon- when a real trial of Tony Blair in a real court."
Friday, February 02, 2007
مصر تسلح فتح
في اطار خدماتها الجليلة للادارة الامريكية و قرة عينيها الاسرائيلية، قررت مصر المساهمة بشكل جاد و مؤثر في تاجيج الصراع بين حماس التي فازت في انتخابات ديمقراطية و فتح التي دمرت السلطة الفلسطينية و نهبت اموال الفلسطينيين
فماذا فعلت مصر مبارك؟ اخر فضائح مصر مبارك اننا ادخلنا شاحنات الي الاراضي الفلسطينية امس الاول تحت مسمي مساعدات غذائية و طبية و طبعا اسرائيل سمحت بمرورها لانها دولة لطيفة جدا زي مصر مبارك
الا ان عندما فتشت عناصر حماس محتوي هذه الشاحانات وجدت اسلحة! و هل تعرفون الي اين كانت ستذهب هذه الاسلحة؟ الي فتح! ليس لمقاومة الاحتلال بالطبع بل لسفك المزيد من الدماء الفلسطينية و اعفاء اسرائيل من هذا الاجرام مؤقتاً
شكرا مصر مبارك
Thursday, February 01, 2007
Al-Masry Al-Youm VS Muslim Brotherhood
I want to write about the so-called "independent" Egyptian daily Al-Masry Al-Youm which is owned by wealthy businessmen with trade links to Israel. (No this isn't fiction, its reality. Ask Salah Diab himself.)
Their Israeli connection isn't the issue here although it's certainly something to keep in mind when evaluating this newspaper.
The issue is the paper's role in serving the regime's interests.
For one thing, it has done the police state in Egypt a huge favour by spearheading the hysterical campaign against this country's oldest and largest opposition group the Muslim Brotherhood. Even the sick pro-government (or shall we say Interior Ministry mouthpiece?) Rose El-Youssef daily newspaper couldn't compete with Al-Masry Al-Youm.
Why? Although Rose El-Youssef publishes nothing but filth and hysterical diatribes which very few people bother to read anyway, its alleagancies to the regime are no secret. This leads anyone with the average IQ to take anything they say with a grain of salt because it is official government propaganda.
But with the self-proclaimed "independent" Al-Masry Al-Youm, the average reader with average IQ, political "awareness" and all probably wont suspect any wrong-doing on the paper's part because it's "objective" and all that stuff. Al-Masry Al-Youm also seemed to take *sides* with the *reform* movement. In many ways it served as a platform for government critics and an activities calendar for the many anti-Mubarak and anti-dictatorship/corruption demonstrations that marked 2005 and the first half of 2006.
Yet the stench of the rotten in Al-Masry Al-Youm is beginning to suffocate me (read their story in p5 today titled 'The mufti: forming a muslim brotherhood party will transforms Muslims to sects' [Since when do we care what the mufti's political views are? Clearly the "liberal" Al-Masry Al-Youm does because they're campaigning against the MB). I found their police work in inciting public opinion against the Muslim Brotherhood quite appalling if not cheap and I have a major issue with their sensitive approach towards he who thinks of himself as heir-to-be, the Gamal Mubarak.
Yes Al-Masry Al-Youm does good reporting in general but that's because the Egyptian press stopped reporting on anything for over a decade now and either suck up to the powers that be (Al-Ahram, Al-Akhbar, Rose El-Youssef etc) OR rant about the powers that be (El-Destour, Soat El-Umma, El-Karama etc).
And since Al-Masry Al-Youm is doing some journalism it stands out as "the professional" the "independent" the whatever it likes to call itself.. But in fact its not.
When you join ranks with a despotic regime that has done as much destruction to a country (Egypt) as the occupation did in Iraq (without a classic war and a classic occuption although both exist in Egypt nonetheless)- then you are far from serving as an independent newspaper nor do you subscribe to the aims, purposes or objectives of honest journalism.
When you help the regime quash its opponents and you tread cautiously around its glaring plans to install the Gamal Mubarak, you're committing a crime.
Al-Masry Al-Youm is helping the regime in its vicious campaign against the Muslim Brotherhood simply because they constitute a threat to the authorities and not because they have issues with the group's ideology. (Egypt is already an Islamic state just look at the hijab, the niqab, the chador, the beards, the writing on the wall- you name it and yet neither the regime nor its spasticated liberal cohorts give a damn.. noooo, all they're worried about is the muslim brotherhood bogeyman). And this, my dears, is what the security apparatus does already so why is this newspaper helping them? Or is it a newspaper?
Al-Masry Al-Youm is also promoting the Gamal Mubarak.
Al-Masry Al-Youm is fake.
Their Israeli connection isn't the issue here although it's certainly something to keep in mind when evaluating this newspaper.
The issue is the paper's role in serving the regime's interests.
For one thing, it has done the police state in Egypt a huge favour by spearheading the hysterical campaign against this country's oldest and largest opposition group the Muslim Brotherhood. Even the sick pro-government (or shall we say Interior Ministry mouthpiece?) Rose El-Youssef daily newspaper couldn't compete with Al-Masry Al-Youm.
Why? Although Rose El-Youssef publishes nothing but filth and hysterical diatribes which very few people bother to read anyway, its alleagancies to the regime are no secret. This leads anyone with the average IQ to take anything they say with a grain of salt because it is official government propaganda.
But with the self-proclaimed "independent" Al-Masry Al-Youm, the average reader with average IQ, political "awareness" and all probably wont suspect any wrong-doing on the paper's part because it's "objective" and all that stuff. Al-Masry Al-Youm also seemed to take *sides* with the *reform* movement. In many ways it served as a platform for government critics and an activities calendar for the many anti-Mubarak and anti-dictatorship/corruption demonstrations that marked 2005 and the first half of 2006.
Yet the stench of the rotten in Al-Masry Al-Youm is beginning to suffocate me (read their story in p5 today titled 'The mufti: forming a muslim brotherhood party will transforms Muslims to sects' [Since when do we care what the mufti's political views are? Clearly the "liberal" Al-Masry Al-Youm does because they're campaigning against the MB). I found their police work in inciting public opinion against the Muslim Brotherhood quite appalling if not cheap and I have a major issue with their sensitive approach towards he who thinks of himself as heir-to-be, the Gamal Mubarak.
Yes Al-Masry Al-Youm does good reporting in general but that's because the Egyptian press stopped reporting on anything for over a decade now and either suck up to the powers that be (Al-Ahram, Al-Akhbar, Rose El-Youssef etc) OR rant about the powers that be (El-Destour, Soat El-Umma, El-Karama etc).
And since Al-Masry Al-Youm is doing some journalism it stands out as "the professional" the "independent" the whatever it likes to call itself.. But in fact its not.
When you join ranks with a despotic regime that has done as much destruction to a country (Egypt) as the occupation did in Iraq (without a classic war and a classic occuption although both exist in Egypt nonetheless)- then you are far from serving as an independent newspaper nor do you subscribe to the aims, purposes or objectives of honest journalism.
When you help the regime quash its opponents and you tread cautiously around its glaring plans to install the Gamal Mubarak, you're committing a crime.
Al-Masry Al-Youm is helping the regime in its vicious campaign against the Muslim Brotherhood simply because they constitute a threat to the authorities and not because they have issues with the group's ideology. (Egypt is already an Islamic state just look at the hijab, the niqab, the chador, the beards, the writing on the wall- you name it and yet neither the regime nor its spasticated liberal cohorts give a damn.. noooo, all they're worried about is the muslim brotherhood bogeyman). And this, my dears, is what the security apparatus does already so why is this newspaper helping them? Or is it a newspaper?
Al-Masry Al-Youm is also promoting the Gamal Mubarak.
Al-Masry Al-Youm is fake.
Back from the dead
I'm back- not that "my readers" were wondering whatever happened to me.
I will volunteer a brief explanation for The Cairene's comeback: I'm fedup with all the madness we all wake up to every single day of our lives. Egypt is no longer a country or a state to start with and the good old "Arab world" decided that the best way for our advancement and progress is to effectively curb population growth- by killing each other.
That way we save the Americans and their Israeli friends the moral dilemna (well yes, those first world people must know more than we do about morals, ethics, humanity, equality, the right to live etc..) of occupying, destroying and killing us.
We also save them money, the effort of having to *think* (Bush not intended here lest your dirty minds wonder) or even having to send their boys to our side of the world where -poor souls- they end up all depressed and everything and do naughty things like raping Iraqi teenage girls then killing their families and burning their corpses for good measure.
OK that was not quite as brief as I intended but forgive moi, I've been silent for too long and now is the time my friends to speak.
I will volunteer a brief explanation for The Cairene's comeback: I'm fedup with all the madness we all wake up to every single day of our lives. Egypt is no longer a country or a state to start with and the good old "Arab world" decided that the best way for our advancement and progress is to effectively curb population growth- by killing each other.
That way we save the Americans and their Israeli friends the moral dilemna (well yes, those first world people must know more than we do about morals, ethics, humanity, equality, the right to live etc..) of occupying, destroying and killing us.
We also save them money, the effort of having to *think* (Bush not intended here lest your dirty minds wonder) or even having to send their boys to our side of the world where -poor souls- they end up all depressed and everything and do naughty things like raping Iraqi teenage girls then killing their families and burning their corpses for good measure.
OK that was not quite as brief as I intended but forgive moi, I've been silent for too long and now is the time my friends to speak.
Friday, April 28, 2006
Like Sadat's last days?
What happened yesterday in Cairo and what's happening in Egypt, everyone has been telling me, is reminicent of Sadat's "last days" when he turned against everyone and filled his prisons with thousands of dissidents.
But I digress. The climate is too congested for any Sadat-like scenario. Ethnic tension is very worrying. The judges are being squashed and massacred. People are blowing themselves up in Sinai and everyone is worried. The unknown looms so strongly and nobody seems to have a clue what will happen next.
One can choose to believe in the birth of somethingn good or anticipate a disaster that will befall us all.
May God save Egypt from any harm.
في يوم اعتبره معارضون مشهودا احتشد آلاف المتظاهرين امام دار القضاء العالي في القاهرة امس تضامنا مع ما اصبح يعرف بـ انتفاضة القضاة ، اثناء جلسة محاكمة قاضيين كشفا حدوث عمليات تزوير في الانتخابات الاخيرة.وانهالت الشرطة المصرية بالعصي علي آلاف المتظاهرين الذين اغلقوا عدة شوارع رئيسية في وسط القاهرة، بينما تأجلت محاكمة القاضيين الي الحادي عشر من شهر ايار (مايو) المقبل.وكان ذلك مشهدا مؤثرا عندما خرج القاضيان من مبني دار القضاء لينضما الي المتظاهرين رغم محاولات قوات الامن منعهما من ذلك.وشوهدت عشرات من حافلات جنود الأمن المركزي في وسط القاهرة الذي تحول الي ما يشبه ساحة حرب بعد ان انهالت فرق الكاراتيه التابعة لقوات الامن علي المتظاهرين بالضرب لتفريقهم دون جدوي.وردد المتظاهرون شعارات دعت الي وقف محاكمة القاضيين، والغاء قانون الطوارئ واطلاق الحريات العامة. ومن ابرز الشعارات التي رددوها (يا قضاة يا قضاة انتو املنا امام الله)، (مش هنلين ومش هنطاطي، احنا سرهنا الصوت الواطي)، (باطل باطل، مبارك باطل) (قالوا حرية وقالوا قانون، وادي اخوانا في السجون). ورفعوا لافتات تشدد علي الوحدة الوطنية المصرية وعدالة القضاء، وقالت احداها (افرجوا عن مصر).
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
انضموا لقضاة مصر 17 مارس
انضموا لقضاة مصر يوم الجمعة 17 مارس
لجنة أنصار القضاة تؤكد لكم بعد الاتصال بمجموعة من القضاة الشرفاء...تأكيدهم على رغبتهم فى دعم شعبي لمطالبهم، وتلاحم جميع القوى الحرة من معارضة وغيرها مع مطالب استقلال القضاء...
قضاة مصر يمدون أيديهم لكل مواطن مصرى شريف يحرص على استقلال القضاء تحقيقا للعدالة...ويوجهون ندائهم اليكم ان تنضموا لهم يوم الجمعة 17 مارس فى اعتصامهم ومسيرتهم المطالبة باستقلال القضاء.
فليلتف كل حريص على العدالة...وضد المساس باستقلال القضاء وقضاتنا الشرفاء ممن دفعوا ثمنا باهظا لنزاهة الانتخابات وتحقيق العدالة وعدم تزييف أصواتنا وسرقة ارادتنا وسيادة القانون...من أمثال المستشارة نهى الزينى، والمستشار أحمد مكى، والمستشار محمود مكى، والمستشار محمود الخضيرى، والمستشار هشام البسطويسي وعلى رأسهم المستشار زكريا عبد العزيز رئيس نادى القضاة...ممن يتصدون لمحاولات فرض سيطرة السلطة على القضاء المصرى النزيه وتقويض استقلاله...بعد ان قال كلمته فى وجه الطغاة فى انتخابات نادى القضاة، وما سبقه من محاولات حثيثة للحفاظ على نزاهة الانتخابات التشريعية، وفضح لكافة ممارسات السلطة فى تزويرها...
ليبقى القضاء قلعة للحرية وسيادة القانون وأملا للبسطاء والضعفاء فى تحقيق العدالة ضد الطغاة وعصابات البلطجة والفساد...
استقلال القضاء هو حائط الصد الاخير لتحقيق العدالة للشعب المصرى ضد كل فساد وتزوير، ضد قانون الغابة والبلطجة، ضد اطلاق أيادى الفساد العاصفة بأقواتنا المغتصبة لارادتنا.
لا خير فينا ان تركناهم وحدهم لسلطة تعصف بكل الحقوق وبالقانون واحكام القضاء وبكل شريف يتصدى للفساد والظلم..
ان سقطت آخر قلاع الحرية والقانون والعدالة...فأى ملجئ لنا من البلطجة والفاسدين الطغاة...أى ملجئ لضحايا المحارق فى عرض البحر وعبارات الموت، والمسارح والقطارات؟!!
أى ملجئ للعاطلين وفقراء من المتلاعبين بالاسعار والاقوات وضحايا المتاجرة بالأمراض والسرطان وألفلونزا الطيور ممن فلسوا آلاف المواطنين لصالح أحد كبارالمستثمرين من أعضاء لجنة السياسات شركاء الاسرة الحاكمة الوارثة لعرش مصر؟!
إن نجحت السلطة فى فرض سيطرتها على القضاء فلا أمل فى عدالة وسيادة للقانون وحقوق مواطنة وضرب الفساد وتحقيق مظالم البسطاء فى وجه سلطات غاشمة وعصابات تحكم اغتصابا وتفسد فى الارض وتتاجر بالموت والمرض وتورثنا وكأننا عبيد...لا مجال لحقوق مواطنة ان تمت مذبحة للقضاء المصرى وتقويض استقلاله.
فلنحمى القضاة واستقلالهم....ليحمينا من الظلم والفساد والبلطجة والاستبداد...
نداء نوجهه لكل القوى الحية وشرفاء هذا الوطن المهدر دمه وثرواته ومصيره ومستقبله وارادته وأمنه...
وليكن استقلال القضاة اول خطوة لتحرير ارادتنا وطنا وارضا وشعبا...
ليقل الشعب كلمته مع قضاته...الحرية والاستقلال وسيادة القانون...وليرحل عنا الطغاة والفاسدين والظالمين وعصابات البلطجة والتوريث
فنحن مواطنون ولسنا رعايا...نريد دولة مؤسسات وليس عصابات تتاجر فينا وبنا...نحتكم لقضاء شريف ومستقل يعلى قيمة القانون وسيادته...
فلنقف وقفة رجل واحد...لا تخذلوا القضاة حتى لا يخذلونا...لا تتركوا القضاة وحدهم فى وجه حاكم ظالم...لا تطلقوا يد الظلم تعبث بقضاء مصر النزيه والشرفاء من قضاة مصر...
عاش قضاء مصر نزيها شريفا...وعاش القضاة الشرفاء المتصدين للطغاة والظلم والفساد
عاشت مصر حرة...وعاش شعب مصر الأبي حرا كريما وعصيا على كل من طغى وأفسد فى الارض
لجنة مناصرة القضاة
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
منع ابراهيم نافع من دخول الاهرام
تطورات غير متوقعة في مؤسسة الاهرام. هل سيكون لها تداعيات؟ هل المؤسسة في انهيار ام علي وشك التحول الي شئ اخر خاصة بعد ثورة محرريها الاخيرة و المستمرة علي تدهور الجريدة و اصدارات الاهرام الاخري
خسارة يا اهرام ما فعلته بك الدولة و مسئوليها الجهلة المستبدين
المصريون نشرت موضوع عن طرد ابراهيم نافع
كتب ـ أحمد عثمان (المصريون) : بتاريخ 28 - 2 - 2006
علمت "المصريون" أن جهة سيادية أصدرت تعليمات لإدارة الأمن بمؤسسة الأهرام بمنع إبراهيم نافع رئيس مجلس إدارة وتحرير المؤسسة السابق من دخولها والاكتفاء بإرسال ساعي له يوميا لاستلام المقال الخاص به.وأوضحت مصادر مطلعة داخل المؤسسة أن الجهة السيادية اتخذت هذا القرار بعد أن تعالت في الفترة الأخيرة شكوى العديد من كبار الصحفيين من تدخل نافع في السياسة التحريرية للأهرام وفرضه وصاية على أسامة سرايا رئيس التحرير الحالي ، وهو ما يتنافى مع كرامة العاملين في المؤسسة خصوصا أن الإدارة التحريرية للجريدة أحست بانتكاسة في الفترة الأخيرة بعد تخلي رئيس التحرير عن الأسلوب الرصين الذي التزمت به الجريدة لسنوات
اقرأ الخبر كاملا هنا
Monday, February 27, 2006
ايدز و شذوذ جنسي في سجن بورسعيد
هلي يعقل هذا الكلام؟ المصري اليوم نشرت في عددها اليوم الاتي
حالة ايدز في سجن بورسعيد تشعل معركة حول الخلوة الشرعية و اوضاع المساجين
كتبت- هبة حسنين
اكرم الشاعر نائب الاخوان اتهم الاجهزة الامنية بأنها مسئوولة عن الانتهاكات التي تحدث داخل السجون المصرية و التي تعدت الجلد و التعذيب و منع الزيارات و غياب الرعاية الطبية وصولا لظهور الايدز بين السجناء الذي ادي الي وفاة احد السجناء في بورسعيد، و فجر الشاعر في حلقة امس الاول من برنامج الحقيقة علي قناة دريم احتمال وجود اصابات اخري داخل السجون غير معلن عنها او غير معروفة حتي الان، نتيجة ممارسة الشذوذ
كنت اطالب و لا ازال حتي الان باتاحة الفرصة للمسجونين المحكوم عليهم باكثر من عام للخلوة الشرعية مع زوجاتهم منها للشذوذ و اتخاذ هذا الاجراء كوسيلة ثواب و عقاب للمسجونين لانهم بشر لهم الحق في الاستمتاع حتي لا يلجأوا لاساليب اخري غير شرعية و ظهور الايدز في السجون افضل توقيت لاعادة طرح هذا الموضوع الذي سيقضي علي عديد من المشاكل
كلام الشاعر اثار غضب اللواء مجدي البسيوني مساعد وزير الداخلية الاسبق الذي رد مهاجما كيف تقبل علي نفسك و انت منتم للجماعات الاسلامية ان تخرج زوجة السجين من بينها امام جيرانها و اولادها للذهاب الي زوجها لتمارس معه الجنس و نحن في مجتمع شرقي لا يزال الجنس فيه موضوعا شائكا و امرا لا يعلم موعده الا الزوجان، فاين الحياء؟
***
حقيقة لا ادري ايهما اكثر تخلفاً النائب الاخواني الذي يتصور ان الايدز ياتي فقط عن طريق الشذوذ الجنسي و يريد افراغ عقوبة السجن من مضمونها عندما يطالب بالخلوة الشرعية للسجين! صحيح ان في السجون ابرياء و لكن عقوبة السجن للذين يخرقون القانون باشكاله و الهدف من السجن الحرمان من كل اشكال الحرية و منها بالطبع ممارسة الجنس
و لا افهم لماذا يقدم النائب الاخوان الرجال في السجون علي انهم حيوانات ان لم يمارسوا الجنس مع زوجاتهم يتجهون فوراً للشذوذ الجنسي كبديل؟ هذا افتراض مريض و متخلف
و ماذا يقترح للمساجين غير المتزوجين؟ اليست عندهم رغبات ايضا؟ و لماذا لم يشير ايضا الي حرمان النزيلات من نفس الحق الذي يطالب به للرجال؟
اما مساعد وزير الداخلية الاسبق: يا ربي ما هذا التخلف العقلي هو الاخر؟ كل ما يزعجه في الامر ان تخرج الزوجة و يا للهول امام جيرانها -حيث انهم طبعا سيكونوا مطلعين علي سبب خروجها من المنزل- و كانها ستقوم بعمل فاحش!!! ثم يتسال كيف يقوم نائب منتمي للتيار الاسلامي بطلب كهذا؟ حسناً، ماذا لو تقدم بهذا الطلب نائب عن حزب التجمع اليساري يا تري؟ هل يجوز ام لا يجوز؟
هذه المشهد خير دليل علي التخلف الثقافي و العقلي و الحضاري عند صناع القرار في هذا البلد. و احفظنا يا رب
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
